- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:33:08 -0700
- To: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:43 PM, John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com> wrote: > I'm going to ask this again because I made the mistake of including all of the summary and minutes in my last reply. I'm sure that due to that error, my question was completely missed... > >> RESOLVED: >> >> - use flow-into and flow-from properties and explain the interaction with >> the css3 contents module definition of the content property. The flow-into >> and flow-from properties should be <string> > > It's very difficult to tell from the minutes why this was resolved to be a string. Alex asked this as well [1]. Can anyone clarify? I'm not even sure who argued to make it a string rather than in ident? > > -John > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jun/0155.html We didn't actually resolve that way, at least not to my memory. We wanted to do something other than a bare ident, because it seems relatively likely that this is a property we'd like to later add more controls to, such as default flows or additional options, that may end up being ambiguous with user-defined flow names. Strings or a flow() function, though, are both equally okay. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 06:34:04 UTC