- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:39:23 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 00:39:54 UTC
When we discussed it at F2F, it seemed that using <identifier> type for flow name would not be appropriate, because the ident could be anything and it might conflict with current or future keywords. Is there a rule or an earlier decision on where ident is OK to use and where it has to be a string? There seems to be a precedent of 'counter-increment' being <identifier> (with the values of 'none', 'inherit' and 'initial' being not allowed). Is that approach now considered inferior? Would be good to have a reference to reasoning that supports the decision. Thanks Alex
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 00:39:54 UTC