- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:43:08 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Simon Fraser wrote: > This thread has gone on long enough. > > We're at the point where we obviously have a bunch of competing suggestions, and are not going to reach consensus. It's at this point that you have to stop and ask yourself (especially if you are in a minority) "can I live with a spec which says X". > > I suggest that Tab revert his edit to the spec that changed the meaning of the keywords for linear-gradient (since it wasn't resolved by the WG), and we all step back and consider whether the spec is workable in that form. > I agree. My last post was mostly to provide some requested background information on my earlier proposal.
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 16:43:38 UTC