- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:07:40 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
This thread has gone on long enough. We're at the point where we obviously have a bunch of competing suggestions, and are not going to reach consensus. It's at this point that you have to stop and ask yourself (especially if you are in a minority) "can I live with a spec which says X". I suggest that Tab revert his edit to the spec that changed the meaning of the keywords for linear-gradient (since it wasn't resolved by the WG), and we all step back and consider whether the spec is workable in that form. Simon
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 16:08:23 UTC