- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:10:20 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin" <aharon@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:36 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> On 07/19/2011 03:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:24 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> >>> wrote: >>>> s/we/I/ since that was not a WG decision. Note also that we have explicit >>>> resolutions on this exact issue stating that "list-item-position: >>>> outside" >>>> places the marker on the start side of the list-item based on the >>>> list-item's directionality. >>> >>> I couldn't find any such resolutions by searching my archives. >> >> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-162 >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Apr/0275.html > > Ah, thank you! I knew I was missing something, because I thought I > remembered something along those lines when you mentioned it. > > Okay, I'll change things so that Lists agrees with 2.1. I'll also add > a property that controls the attachment (with the initial value > matching 2.1's behavior), make position:marker consult that property > when deciding where to position things, and set that property > appropriately (to the desired all-on-the-same-side behavior) on > <ol>/<ul> in the recommended default stylesheet. I've now made those changes. So list-style-position:outside is back to its 2.1 behavior, and the marker-attachment property controls whether you use the 2.1 behavior or the behavior that the i18nWG proposed. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 02:11:07 UTC