- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:28:37 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin" <aharon@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:36 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 07/19/2011 03:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:24 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> >> wrote: >>> s/we/I/ since that was not a WG decision. Note also that we have explicit >>> resolutions on this exact issue stating that "list-item-position: >>> outside" >>> places the marker on the start side of the list-item based on the >>> list-item's directionality. >> >> I couldn't find any such resolutions by searching my archives. > > http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-162 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Apr/0275.html Ah, thank you! I knew I was missing something, because I thought I remembered something along those lines when you mentioned it. Okay, I'll change things so that Lists agrees with 2.1. I'll also add a property that controls the attachment (with the initial value matching 2.1's behavior), make position:marker consult that property when deciding where to position things, and set that property appropriately (to the desired all-on-the-same-side behavior) on <ol>/<ul> in the recommended default stylesheet. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 00:29:27 UTC