- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:19:42 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/27/2011 09:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Leif Arne Storset<lstorset@opera.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> The 'object-fit' and 'object-position' properties ask: >>> >>> # Do we need to allow browsers to alias ‘image-position’ >>> # and ‘image-fit’ (the old names for these properties) >>> # to these properties? Does any browser actually need >>> # to do so? >>> >>> I believe only Opera has implemented these, and they were released with >>> the >>> 'object-' names from the beginning. Besides, they were prefixed, so I >>> don't >>> think it would matter anyway. >> >> Removed, thanks for the clarification! > > They weren't there for browser implementations, Tab, they > were there for printer implementations. I don't think you > should have removed that. Were they unprefixed in printers? ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:20:35 UTC