- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:35:00 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "Simon Pieters (zcorpan)" <simonp@opera.com>
On 01/27/2011 09:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Ok, so I'm hearing some good justifications for both 'cover' and > 'none' (and I think 'scale-down' has similar nice justifications). I'm still unsure about 'none'. The use case Leif has given is panning the image, and in that case you'd probably want more than just the ability to pan at 100% zoom level. If that's the use case we're addressing, we should add percentages or something. > I'm also hearing support from Safari and Opera about making replaced > elements *always* hide their overflow. > > Is that acceptable to you, dbaron? I agree that the contents of replaced elements should always be clipped to the content edge. (I thought I'd made those changes already. Must've been to css3-background.) ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:35:40 UTC