- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:18:05 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/27/2011 09:14 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Leif Arne Storset<lstorset@opera.com> wrote: >> The 'object-fit' and 'object-position' properties ask: >> >> # Do we need to allow browsers to alias ‘image-position’ >> # and ‘image-fit’ (the old names for these properties) >> # to these properties? Does any browser actually need >> # to do so? >> >> I believe only Opera has implemented these, and they were released with the >> 'object-' names from the beginning. Besides, they were prefixed, so I don't >> think it would matter anyway. > > Removed, thanks for the clarification! They weren't there for browser implementations, Tab, they were there for printer implementations. I don't think you should have removed that. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:18:40 UTC