- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:53:53 +0100
- To: <tao.yu@nokia.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
I think "background: url(foo), white" is a shortcut for "background: transprent url(foo) repeat top left, white none repeat to left". The first specified background (the image) is over the "white" background and as the first background has no inherent color, this has the same effect as "background: white url(foo) repeat top left;". -----Message d'origine----- From: tao.yu@nokia.com Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 4:39 PM To: www-style@w3.org Cc: Art.Barstow@nokia.com Subject: [css3-background] 'background: url(foo) white' and 'background: url(foo), white' Hi, I am not clear about the last statement in section 3.10 "The 'background' shorthand property", which says: Note that 'background: url(foo) white' and 'background: url(foo), white' have the same effect. Does that mean comma can be used between any of the individual properties and have the same effect as without it? If so, background: repeat-x, url("support/green15x15.png"), red, padding-box; is equivalent to: background: repeat-x url("support/green15x15.png") red padding-box; Is that correct? I would appreciate if this can be confirmed and explained in more details. Thanks, -Tao
Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 15:54:20 UTC