- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:29:55 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Boris Zbarsky > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:26 PM > To: Daniel Glazman > Cc: www-style list > Subject: Re: [css3-flexbox] intuitivity and width computation rules > > On 1/12/11 5:37 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > > Here's a good example: > > > > http://glazman.org/forCSSWG/flexbox-test.html > > > > (use Firefox4 beta or WebKit) > > > > Nobody - except the CSS WG itself and I'm not even sure - will ever > > understand why the paragraphs make the first flexing box of the second > > section grow... > > Uh... it's really not that hard. > Hard for whom ? If we can get 10 experienced authors in a room and a majority do, on their own, think of setting the width to 0 to achieve the (non-zero) distributed width shown in the reference image they're asked to reproduce then OK.
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 23:30:38 UTC