- From: Irfan Mir <theirf@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:05:04 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hmmm well what are the statuses that a proposed idea can be at-- I am assuming last call is towards the middle of the ranks / statuses and recommended is the final status? Also, I apologise if this sounds impatient, but I want to be prepared; therefore, does anyone know if there is a time line or schedule for when css images level 3 will reach last call status or any of the other statuses? Or even when it reached any status it may have even already surpassed.' -Irfan. On 10Jan, 2011, at 2:18 pm, Peter Beverloo wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 19:42, Irfan Mir <theirf@gmail.com> wrote: >> I had looked into the vendor specific prefixes for Gecko and WebKit, but they do not validate because they are vendor specific >> >> Shouldn't using the official syntax, linear-gradient: / radial-gradient: without the prefixes validate? >> > > Yes, these will validate, however, no gradient will be visible yet. > Generally browser vendors will use their prefixes until a > specification reaches *at least* Last Call status. CSS Images Level 3, > the specification gradients are a part of, isn't quite there yet. > > As the specification matures, the prefixes will be dropped and you'll > be able to use "linear-gradient". Vendor prefixes are being used to > warn developers that the syntax of the property may be changed, > meaning websites that rely on them might break. > > Kind regards, > Peter Beverloo
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 01:05:42 UTC