On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Le 02/12/2011 19:25, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> In any case, something like the above applies - counters that have >> never been explicitly reset are still implicitly reset in some way. > > Shouldn’t Lists 3 define this explicitly? Yes. My email said, in a previous section, that I'd be defining that. ~TJReceived on Friday, 2 December 2011 21:31:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:08 UTC