- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:34:54 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 02/12/2011 19:25, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : > In any case, something like the above applies - counters that have > never been explicitly reset are still implicitly reset in some way. Shouldn’t Lists 3 define this explicitly? -- Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 18:35:48 UTC