- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:21:20 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 02:32:14 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> > wrote: >> [<'background-position'>,]? > ... >> [<bg-position>,]? > > That's the only difference, right? > > If so, then either is valid, but I don't have to define what > <'background-position'> means - according to the Values module, it > means "whatever is accepted by the 'background-position' property". It's worth noting that although they are both valid, they are not equivalent, given that css3-background introduces multiple background layers. Though this is no longer an issue for css3-images, since the change seems to have been reverted. -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 09:21:49 UTC