- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:15:24 -0700
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 02:32:14 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> If so, then either is valid, but I don't have to define what >> <'background-position'> means - according to the Values module, it >> means "whatever is accepted by the 'background-position' property". > > It's worth noting that although they are both valid, they are not > equivalent, given that css3-background introduces multiple background > layers. > > Though this is no longer an issue for css3-images, since the change seems to > have been reverted. Sorry, I accidentally responded to Brian off-list recognizing this point, and reverted the change. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 19:26:37 UTC