On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > On 12/08/11 6:46 AM, Eli Morris-Heft wrote: >> >> As an author, even if we are going to use the element(id) notation, I >> think it would be good to mark the id as an id instead of a keyword by >> saying element(#bar). It's visually distinctive and clearly marks a >> different kind of value. > > In which case I'm not sure why we wouldn't just use url(#bar), with a > restriction saying that it must be same document. > > element() has the additional functionality of being able to use the CSS > element map. I'm not sure how useful that would be for the nav-* > properties. (Could be.) url() resolves relative urls relative to the stylesheet's url, not the document. I wouldn't want that behavior to change in some contexts. element() always resolves against the document (because it's actually resolving a selector, not a relative url). ~TJReceived on Thursday, 11 August 2011 23:54:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:50:05 UTC