- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:22:33 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:39 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > I'm leaning towards dropping min() and max() support from the calc() > implementation in Mozilla. > > They make a whole bunch of things a good bit more complicated, > nearly impossible, or actually impossible, such as determining if > there is a percentage basis that could make an expression nonzero, > or computing certain cases of intrinsic widths correctly. > > Are there any strong reasons for keeping min() and max()? (I think > I was one of the original advocates of adding them.) It would be useful for specifying Template Layout's algorithm as a table-layout value, but we can just use them as special values in the template syntax at that point, like we do currently with the minmax() function. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 21:23:28 UTC