RE: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-3d-transforms] Relationship of CSSMatrix interface definitions from Sylvain Galineau on 2010-09-08 (www-style@w3.org from September 2010)

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:24:22 +0000
To: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E27CACCC0@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.>

> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Chris Marrin


> That looks much more clear, to me at least. Is it legal to redefine the
> translate, scale and rotate functions?

Legal in what sense ? It certainly makes sense to add the optional z parameter 
to the 3D interface and it seems cumbersome to have two versions of each
method.



> It would be useful to link to the 2D Transform spec (or a normative
> reference to it) somewhere in section 11.1.

Yes.

Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 21:24:57 UTC