- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:15:15 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:59 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > And you'd rather use a comma than "to"? I think it's clearer to use "to" > since we're separating the colors with commas. I prefer commas because it's more consistent, and it's how nearly every programming language does functions, particularly javascript. > While we're at it, the use of a comma to separate the geometry from the > colors also bothers me for the same reason. > > How about > linear-gradient(<position> [to <position>]? as <color>, <color>, ...) > ? That seems even worse to me. ^_^ > If the problem is DOM access, why not define different interfaces for > them (LinearBoxGradient and LinearAngleGradient), but leave the parsed > syntax the same? That's smfr's call. What do you think, Simon? Would that be sufficient? ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 03:16:07 UTC