- From: Jonas Hartmann <j0n4s.h4rtm4nn@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:30:16 +0200
- To: GreLI <greli@mail.ru>
- Cc: "Eric Twilegar" <Eric.Twilegar@onpeak.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hello, while this is nice convention + CSS3 use, its still a /hack/ on class selector because all you did is faking .someRealClassOnDiv.one {} with .someRealClassOnDiv-one {}. Imagen you have a website with some things that should look boxy, some things that should look text-shadowy, some things that should have one style of "attention" e.g. two or three sets of combined "font-styles". What you could do today is grouping a bunch of selectors around those aspects and apply them this way, and use a comment to specify things as an aspect. On 2010-10-28, at 17:10, GreLI wrote: > Thinking on it I found one more way that doesn't require extra class: > [class^="someRealClassOnDiv"] > /* classes starting with "someRealClassOnDiv" */ > { > border-style:solid; > border-width:1px 1px 0; > } > > .someRealClassOnDiv-one { > border-color:green; > } > .someRealClassOnDiv-two { > border-color:blue; > } > > CSS3 selectors are really powerful tool. > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:20:20 +0400, Eric Twilegar <Eric.Twilegar@onpeak.com> wrote: > >> Many times in CSS I find myself copying and pasting the exact block of CSS statements from block to block. >> >> It would be nice if in CSS you could reference one block of CSS inside of another block. >> >> I would suggest that we could create a block with a name perhaps using the $ character to start it. Then refer to it in another block like an include so that the CSS lines are copied in. >> >> >> $bottomLessBorderStyleGroup >> { >> border-style:solid; >> >> border-top-width:1px; >> border-left-width:1px; >> border-right-width:1px; >> border-bottom-width:0px; >> } >> >> ..someRealClassOnADiv >> { >> $bottomLessBorderStyleGroup >> } >> >> >> For now I'm implementing something similar by generating the CSS server side, but it would be nice to not have to go to a pre-processor. >> >> >> et >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 15:30:52 UTC