- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:26:09 -0700
- To: shelby@coolpage.com
- Cc: "HÃ¥kon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com> wrote: > Now assume bar is before baz, and both bar and qux are half as tall as > foo, so then: > > Inline overflow: > f | f | f | bar > baz-----------------> > oo | oo | oo | qux This is neither sane, nor consistent with existing thought on how column spanners would work. Column spanning elements go *below* any preceding content; they *definitely* don't split the content of previous columns based on where they natively sit in their original column (in addition to being weird, it would produce a dependency loop, as the content in the previous columns could flow differently when split by and move the column spanner). ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 00:27:03 UTC