- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:48:42 -0700
- To: shelby@coolpage.com
- Cc: "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com>, Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com> wrote: > Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: >> It seems that the other part of this debate -- how to increase >> influence over how overflow situations are handled -- must be left for >> a future draft. > > > I am happy enough you are aware of it. Does that mean not in CSS3, or > possibly in a next draft of CSS3? Apologies I am ignorant of the process > here. No problem. There's no such thing as "CSS3", which is an unfortunate source of widespread confusion. After CSS2.1 the group moved entirely to a modular system, where we produce many drafts covering different aspects, which are then allowed to progress at their own rate. So this just means that it won't show up in the current Multicol module (because it's in CR and nearly ready to finish up the standardization process). Instead, it will be looked at when we produce an update to Multicol, which may be soon. (Ideally we might work in an unversioned manner, but W3C process requires us to periodically close things off and finalize them as standards. This doesn't mean that progress has to stop, just that occasionally we'll define a stopping point, work on polishing up what's there, and then put the new stuff in a second module later on.) ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 20:50:08 UTC