- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:49:34 -0800
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:09 PM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:50 AM, François REMY >> <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: >> > It works in CSS 2.1 and don't use the non-widely implemented >> > to-be-standardized CSS3 transform property. > >> I don't understand this comment - the Transforms spec was accepted by >> the WG, and transforms are fairly widely implemented at this point. >> It's still in WD for now, but it'll probably start moving upwards in >> the next few months. > > It's only intended to reflect a practical 'real life' implementation point > of view. > If you take 10 visitors, 5+ of them will use a browser that don't support > CSS 3 > Transforms, even prefixed (IE8-, FireFox 3.0-, ...). > > This makes the use of CSS Transform a no-go for any essential functionnality > of your website. (It would be even clearer if vendor-prefixed properties > only > worked in a "dev" mode, or by 'page-specific' / 'site header ' opt-in but > it's > not the case, for political and historical reasons). > > CSS 2.1 is supported by all browsers used today, or nearly. I just meant > that, > not anything else ;-) Okay, but that's true of most CSS3 stuff, almost none of which is supported by IE8 and lower, or earlier versions of other modern browsers. It just seemed an odd statement. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 20:50:31 UTC