- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 01:41:34 +1100
- To: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Lee Kowalkowski wrote: [snip] > Your argument is actually absurd, because it's arguing against > background-position too, saying one must not use it for image sprites, > I'm not wishing to debate that. Only the omission of > background-position-x and -y. > > Do you actually have an objection against -x and -y? I haven't seen > one. These "image-sprites are hacks" objections apply to > background-position itself also, I'd like to see a specific objection > to -x and -y. If two implementations support a property, it is possible for it to become a standard. The following is supported in IE8+. -ms-background-position-x http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms530719%28v=VS.85%29.aspx -ms-background-position-y http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms530720%28v=VS.85%29.aspx I would like to see your use cases. -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 14:42:10 UTC