W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2010

Re: Selectors, vendor prefixes (again...) and IE9

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 08:45:47 -0700
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100514154547.GB19444@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2010-05-14 11:26 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> That means that at this time, ::selection is NOT standard,

But ::selection was in a Candidate Recommendation of selectors,
which means we've ok'ed shipping without vendor prefixes:
And it was shipped as CR in November 2001 and not removed from the
spec (as published on the TR page) until March 2009.

That said, I'd like to know how existing implementations handle the
issues in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Oct/0268.html ,
which I think covers the main areas where the spec for ::selection
was underdefined.  (Do they use one of the proposals there, do they
violate some of the requirements that led to those proposals, or
something else?)


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 15:46:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:46 UTC