- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 08:45:47 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday 2010-05-14 11:26 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote: > That means that at this time, ::selection is NOT standard, But ::selection was in a Candidate Recommendation of selectors, which means we've ok'ed shipping without vendor prefixes: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-css3-selectors-20011113/#UIfragments And it was shipped as CR in November 2001 and not removed from the spec (as published on the TR page) until March 2009. That said, I'd like to know how existing implementations handle the issues in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Oct/0268.html , which I think covers the main areas where the spec for ::selection was underdefined. (Do they use one of the proposals there, do they violate some of the requirements that led to those proposals, or something else?) -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 15:46:18 UTC