On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> > wrote: > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Not necessarily. Say two adjacent margins are calc(20px+1fl) and > >> calc(10px+2fl). I think we could get away with collapsing their > >> pieces separately, so it's equivalent to a single margin with > >> calc(20px+2fl). > > > > > > That's actually a spec change. > > A change to which spec? > The flexbox spec. My point is that calc(20px + 1fl) collapsed with calc(10px + 2fl) is not the same as calc(20px + 2fl) in general. It evaluates to 10px + 1fl + max(10px, 1fl). But I think we can get away with genuinely collapsing calc(20px + 1fl) with calc(10px + 2fl). Probably. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 03:16:29 UTC