Re: [css3-content] "content" property, replaced elements, and width

On Mon, 10 May 2010 16:54:11 +0200, Daniel Glazman  
<> wrote:
> Le 08/05/10 11:52, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
>> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:05:07 +1000, L. David Baron <>
>> wrote:
>>> That is, with this
>>> extension, an image element is just displayed using the rule:
>>> img { content: attr(src, url); }
>> I used to think this was a pretty neat abstraction, but now I know more
>> of how <img> interacts with the DOM in terms of events and state exposed
>> on the HTMLImageElement object I wonder whether it is still useful to
>> think of <img> being implemented in the above way. I.e. if the HTML just
>> says
> Yes, it is still useful. Big Corporate sites __need__ this.

Why would they need <img> to be implemented in this way? I don't  
understand. Do you mean to say that the 'content' property is useful? I  
would agree with that and never said otherwise.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 15:30:19 UTC