- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:54:11 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 08/05/10 11:52, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Sun, 09 May 2010 01:05:07 +1000, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
> wrote:
>> That is, with this
>> extension, an image element is just displayed using the rule:
>>
>> img { content: attr(src, url); }
>
> I used to think this was a pretty neat abstraction, but now I know more
> of how <img> interacts with the DOM in terms of events and state exposed
> on the HTMLImageElement object I wonder whether it is still useful to
> think of <img> being implemented in the above way. I.e. if the HTML just
> says
Yes, it is still useful. Big Corporate sites __need__ this.
</Daniel>
Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 14:54:46 UTC