- From: Yuzo Fujishima <yuzo@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:11:36 +0900
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 03:12:44 UTC
Hi, John, Tab, Thank you for the responses. Please consider adding to the spec some text for clarification. Yuzo On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:55 AM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > Yuzo Fujishima wrote: > > > >> /* Second */ > >> @font-face { > >> font-family:myfont; > >> src: url(DownloadErrorNumber.ttf); /* Assume this causes a download > error */ > >> unicode-range: U+30-39; > >> } > >> > >> What should happen if DownloadErrorNumber.ttf is unavailable and causes > >> a download error for the second rule? Should we: > >> (A) Ignore only the second rule, i.e., the first and the third rules > >> remain in effect , or > >> (B) Ignore all the rules for the same font family, i.e., ignore all the > three? > > > > It looks like the definition of the @font-face 'src' descriptor needs to > > be clearer about this, the intent is that if all the values in the src > > list fail for whatever reason that face is ignored, the effect is > > equivalent to the omitting the @font-face rule definition (option (A) in > > your list. > Agreed that (A) is definitely what's desired, and that the prose needs > some clarity on the matter. > ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 03:12:44 UTC