- From: Luiz Agostini <luiz.agostini@openbossa.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:36:46 -0300
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Kenneth Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@openbossa.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org, marcosc@opera.com
- Message-ID: <AANLkTimvGVTH1QdWoJHj02_rt6WD8pQRnzQU_d3zFiuG@mail.gmail.com>
interface StyleMedia { readonly attribute DOMString type; boolean matchMedia(DOMString media); void addMediaListener(DOMString media, BooleanCallback mediacallback); void removeMediaListener(DOMString media, BooleanCallback mediacallback); }; [Callback=FunctionOnly, NoInterfaceObject] interface BooleanCallback { void handleEvent(boolean arg); }; Is it what we are agreeing on? Did we agree on accepting media_query_lists instead of only media_queries? If we did then we need to specify how to compare media_query_lists. Luiz 2010/7/14 Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> > I can live with this. Let's give it a try in WebKit and see how well it > works. > > Simon > > On Jul 14, 2010, at 3:26 am, Kenneth Christiansen wrote: > > > That sounds fine with me. Does any of you other guys disagree with the > renaming? > > > > Kenneth > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:34:00 +0200, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I have been thinking about this some more and I am no longer convinced > >>>> the complexity is justified. I think using closures is fine. For other > >>>> languages the bindings can be slightly modified to return a token > instead or > >>>> something. But there's no need to make the ECMAScript variant more > complex > >>>> as well, especially since not all implementations will have various > >>>> languages implementing these bindings, and also since the dominant use > of > >>>> this API will be in ECMAScript. > >>> > >>> I'm not keen on having to special-case generated code, and, in WebKit, > we > >>> compile Objective-C bindings for many of the IDL interfaces, and see > people > >>> use them fairly extensively in applications that embed WebKit. > >>> > >>> Can you re-state your proposal so we're all on the same page? > >> > >> My proposal is that we do the renaming but otherwise keep the > specification > >> as-is: > >> > >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/#the-stylemedia-interface > >> > >> Making it more complex just to suit the non-ECMAScript case does not > seem > >> worth it. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Anne van Kesteren > >> http://annevankesteren.nl/ > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Kenneth Rohde Christiansen > > Technical Lead / Senior Software Engineer > > Qt Labs Americas, Nokia Technology Institute, INdT > > Phone +55 81 8895 6002 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:37:20 UTC