- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:06:33 -0700
- To: Kenneth Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@openbossa.org>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Luiz Agostini <luiz.agostini@openbossa.org>, www-style@w3.org, marcosc@opera.com
I can live with this. Let's give it a try in WebKit and see how well it works. Simon On Jul 14, 2010, at 3:26 am, Kenneth Christiansen wrote: > That sounds fine with me. Does any of you other guys disagree with the renaming? > > Kenneth > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:34:00 +0200, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>>> >>>> I have been thinking about this some more and I am no longer convinced >>>> the complexity is justified. I think using closures is fine. For other >>>> languages the bindings can be slightly modified to return a token instead or >>>> something. But there's no need to make the ECMAScript variant more complex >>>> as well, especially since not all implementations will have various >>>> languages implementing these bindings, and also since the dominant use of >>>> this API will be in ECMAScript. >>> >>> I'm not keen on having to special-case generated code, and, in WebKit, we >>> compile Objective-C bindings for many of the IDL interfaces, and see people >>> use them fairly extensively in applications that embed WebKit. >>> >>> Can you re-state your proposal so we're all on the same page? >> >> My proposal is that we do the renaming but otherwise keep the specification >> as-is: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/#the-stylemedia-interface >> >> Making it more complex just to suit the non-ECMAScript case does not seem >> worth it. >> >> >> -- >> Anne van Kesteren >> http://annevankesteren.nl/ >> > > > > -- > Kenneth Rohde Christiansen > Technical Lead / Senior Software Engineer > Qt Labs Americas, Nokia Technology Institute, INdT > Phone +55 81 8895 6002 / E-mail kenneth.christiansen at openbossa.org
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:07:27 UTC