- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:49:01 +0100
- To: Adrian Price <adrian.price@rogue-technologies.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Adrian Price wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:03 PM, David Woolley > <forums@david-woolley.me.uk <mailto:forums@david-woolley.me.uk>> wrote: > > Adrian Price wrote: > > I apologize if this is an issue that's been raised before - I > was amazed > > > It has; many times. > > That's what I would have thought -- can you point me to any past > discussion/decision? > http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=%22feature+tests%22&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public_FULL&index-type=t&type-index=www-style "feature test" singular produces some more, but I haven't checked the relevance. http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=%22%40supports%22&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public_FULL&index-type=t&type-index=www-style produces a lot of relevant hits. I don't know if "feature queries" produces any not in that last set. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Friday, 9 July 2010 07:49:41 UTC