On Jan 8, 2010, at 2:32 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> I really like the idea in general, but I'm not sure about it being a >> pseudo-class. > > Consider that it's the opposite of :not(). > > div:not(.header, .footer) /* div that is neither .header > nor .footer */ > > div:any(.header, .footer) /* div that is either .header or .footer */ > > As Tab noted, most earlier proposals used :matches() > > div:matches(.header, .footer) Yeah, a light came on and I understood, after subsequent mails. I think the name of the thing ("any") and the original post about grouping was coloring my expectations and throwing me off.Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 23:21:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:42 UTC