- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:20:11 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Nikita Popov <privat@ni-po.com>, news <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 8, 2010, at 2:32 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
wrote:
>> I really like the idea in general, but I'm not sure about it being a
>> pseudo-class.
>
> Consider that it's the opposite of :not().
>
> div:not(.header, .footer) /* div that is neither .header
> nor .footer */
>
> div:any(.header, .footer) /* div that is either .header or .footer */
>
> As Tab noted, most earlier proposals used :matches()
>
> div:matches(.header, .footer)
Yeah, a light came on and I understood, after subsequent mails. I
think the name of the thing ("any") and the original post about
grouping was coloring my expectations and throwing me off.
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 23:21:02 UTC