- From: Ludger Buenger <ludger.buenger@realobjects.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:32:05 +0100
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 12:30 AM > Cc: www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: Making pt a non-physical unit > > On 1/7/10 5:57 PM, David Singer wrote: > > It's pretty minor. It's just that a designed 24pt font face is not > the same as the 12pt face drawn twice as large. If the user asks for > general zoom in, they should get the 12pt face drawn larger. (Smaller > faces tend to have larger 'holes' in them, and be a little 'fatter', > for readability). > > I think this might be a philosophical difference but we (Gecko > developers) feel pretty strongly that in this situation we should in > fact use the 24pt font face instead of just upscaling the 12pt one, > precisely because of the readability issue. > > -Boris Which font does gecko use when displaying a two times scaled version of the print preview on screen? 24pt or 2*12pt? The reason why I ask is because this is not only philosophical point of view but also depends on the use case: for an upscaled preview I believe one should't use a different font but scale the original font. Best regards, Ludger
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 09:32:35 UTC