- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:30:55 -0500
- To: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- Cc: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you EVER written any web pages that talk about or use foreign > languages where the text is simply not representable unless you throw > in an image? How can you say "I as user would rather there be no such > thing as images as text"? Of course no one wants that, but there ARE > instances where this is the only solution (or only practical solution, > since a lot of rare Unicode characters are not displayable even on the > latest Windows or Mac systems). Is this really still a practical issue? There are several hundred Wikipedias covering some remarkably obscure languages, and none of them have asked to resort to images for their fonts that I know of. The most I've ever heard is that some want to use web fonts, but that's actually fairly practical these days (easier than images, anyway).
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 22:31:30 UTC