- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:57:50 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org, bjoern@hoehrmann.de, derhoermi@gmx.net
> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> > Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:25:09 +0100 > Hi, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-css3-speech-20041216/ seems to use square > brackets in property syntax definitions as if they imply optionality but they > do not. An example is the 'voice-family' property in the draft. > regards, -- Björn Höhrmann mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de Mailing-list archive link: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jan/0026.html Dear Bjoern, whilst reviewing the status of the CSS3-Speech Module I came across what seems to be an unanswered message from you (at least I can't find any relevant reply in the public mailing-list archive). I realize that you raised your point way back in early 2007, but I might as well address it now ;) (1) the square bracket notation is used not only in CSS-Speech, but also in other modules, and in fact in CSS 2.1 too (for example [1]). (2) optionality is represented using a question mark, square bracket is used for grouping. Regards, Daniel [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/propidx.html
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 22:58:27 UTC