- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:09:57 +0100
- To: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
* Daniel Weck wrote: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jan/0026.html > >Dear Bjoern, >whilst reviewing the status of the CSS3-Speech Module I came across >what seems to be an unanswered message from you (at least I can't find >any relevant reply in the public mailing-list archive). I realize that >you raised your point way back in early 2007, but I might as well >address it now ;) > >(1) the square bracket notation is used not only in CSS-Speech, but >also in other modules, and in fact in CSS 2.1 too (for example [1]). > >(2) optionality is represented using a question mark, square bracket >is used for grouping. Yes, but if you consider square brackets to represent grouping, then the examples in the draft do not match the grammar, `voice-family: male 2` for instance is not valid because <age> is not optional but omitted in the example. However, it would match if you read (some of the) square brackets to represent optionality. I do agree that the Working Group does not seem to have addressed my comment yet. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 23:10:40 UTC