- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:49:11 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Chris Lilley wrote: > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, 9:27:57 AM, Tab wrote: > > TAJ> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >>> I have been asked by the SVG WG to ask the CSS WG, once again, to allow >>> scientific notation for those properties which allow it. In SVG, currently >>> those properties allow scientific notation in presentation attributes but >>> dissallow it in style sheets (style attributes, style elements, external >>> style sheets). This disparity causes user confusion. > > TAJ> Sigh. We should allow it. It's simple, it's useful, and it's intuitive. > > And already implemented in Firefox, although currently with a "mode bit" so > that it only applies to SVG. > >> Mozilla's CSS parser has a special mode for all styles loaded from SVG, >> including inline styles on SVG-namespace elements. In that mode the >> above regular expression becomes >> >> num ([0-9]+|[0-9]*"."[0-9]+)(e[+-]?[0-9]+)? >> >> (as always, the "e" is case-insensitive). Numbers with this suffix are >> interpreted as scientific notation. A % or {ident} suffix may follow >> the exponent (which converts the token to a PERCENTAGE or DIMENSION >> token) > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0042.html You seem to have missed Zack's response to that message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0049.html ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 12:49:53 UTC