W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2010

Re: [css3-multicol] test suite

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:47:00 +1200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikLgHo19pAyqV1TW+qRO6LytYPmJdRf8oVHxPC5@mail.gmail.com>
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:

> Also sprach Robert O'Callahan:
>  > > If we go with (b), I suggest, well, I don't suggest we do that.
>  > > Clipping makes more sense, no?
>  > I'm not convinced. CSS defaults to overflow:visible and generally
> clipping
>  > only occurs when the author requests it somehow.
>  >
>  > I also think that clipping column rules vertically would be less useful
> than
>  > letting them be the height of the columns, and I think that horizontal
>  > clipping would not be a particularly useful, so I favour not clipping.
> In cases where the height is specified to be longer than the natural
> lengths of the columns, should the column rules be as long as (a) the
> height or (b) the natural length?

I would say (b).

I just can't think of any situations where an author would want rules the
height of the column-box instead of the height of the columns.

Should column rules be clipped where column-span elements are -- or
> should one have to specify a background color on the column-span
> elements in order to hide the column rules?

I'd clip them.

"Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures
every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 00:47:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:49:46 UTC