- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:45:02 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 5, 2010, at 3:30 PM, fantasai wrote: > There were a a couple proposals at the F2F that I wanted to make > sure didn't get lost. > > From Bert: > Rename animation-iteration-count to animation-play-count > * easier to spell > * consistent with marquee-play-count OK with me. > From Tantek: > Rename animation-duration to animation-period > * Avoids confusion about whether it refers to the duration > of a cycle, or the total length of the animation. (This > kind of mix-up came up several times during the discussion.) Period is a bit geeky, but more precise. I could go either way. > Bert also mentioned thinking about the difference between > animation-direction and marquee-direction. Here's marquee-direction: <http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-marquee/#the-marquee-direction> animation-direction: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#the-animation-direction-property- I have no opinion at present. > I'll tack on a fly-by suggestion from me (could be totally off): > Rename animation-fill-mode to animation-extend: start | end | both > * We have enough "fill" concepts already > * Avoids semantically-empty "mode" component Note that we have a fairly strong desire to keep "fill-mode" to match SMIL: <http://www.w3.org/TR/SMIL/smil-timing.html#Timing-fillAttribute> but if you consider "mode" to be redundant it could be "animation-fill": Note that the original proposal was: animation-fill-mode: none | forwards | backwards | both; and those values could also be used with "animation-extend". Simon
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 22:45:51 UTC