- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 23:56:16 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <13A70F99-9FB8-4CC6-B9A2-87F28E2E3752@gmail.com>
On Apr 5, 2010, at 3:30 PM, fantasai wrote: > There were a a couple proposals at the F2F that I wanted to make > sure didn't get lost. > > From Bert: > Rename animation-iteration-count to animation-play-count > * easier to spell > * consistent with marquee-play-count > > From Tantek: > Rename animation-duration to animation-period > * Avoids confusion about whether it refers to the duration > of a cycle, or the total length of the animation. (This > kind of mix-up came up several times during the discussion.) I agree that both those changes would be improvements. > Bert also mentioned thinking about the difference between > animation-direction and marquee-direction. Yeah, 'direction' seems to make more sense for the forward/reverse values of marquee, than for alternate or not. 'Alternate' is not really a direction (it also has two different pronunciations based on if it is a verb or an adjective). Maybe it should be something like 'animation-loop: restart | reverse' > I'll tack on a fly-by suggestion from me (could be totally off): > Rename animation-fill-mode to animation-extend: start | end | both > * We have enough "fill" concepts already > * Avoids semantically-empty "mode" component True. I like 'extend'. But we also have 'start | end' concepts. How about 'animation-extend: begin | finish | both'?
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 06:56:50 UTC