- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 01:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Follow-up to Bert's original mail "[css3-fonts] various comments and typos" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Mar/0553.html Bert Bos wrote: > k) Appendix A doesn't seem to belong in this spec. The "same-origin" > restriction is also incompatible with W3C's Recommended Web architecture > (see, e.g., section 2.5 in "Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume > One" at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/#uri-opacity) I'm not at all clear why same-origin restrictions are incompatible with W3C's Recommended Web architecture. Same-origin restrictions exist for scripts, are you saying those are incompatible also? The reason for defining this here is that this spec defines the load behavior of @font-face and a same-origin restriction affects that. Whether that's required or not is probably an issue to be decided in conjunction with the newly-formed Web Fonts group but having the description of this in the same spec where @font-face is defined certainly makes things easier for authors and implementers. John
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 08:19:10 UTC