- From: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:16:15 +0100
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:17:47 +0200, Sylvain Galineau > <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com] > > > >> Do you have any suggestions? Can Microsoft maybe provide us with an > >> author/editor for CSSOM? :-) > > > > Are you asking me to volunteer ? To be clear, I'm not worried about > > removing these. I know that even I can do that...But I'd like to > > understand the impact of obsoleting this on existing SVG and CSS3 specs > > as well as implementations, why we wanted to obsolete them etc. And I > > think we're talking about DOM L2 Style here, not CSSOM. Right ? > > Well, CSSOM is the successor of DOM Level 2 Style (it replaces it). I was > asking for someone to edit the replacement, which admittedly is a lot of > work. > > I think the impact on CSS3 proposals is that they need to change. Same > probably goes for SVG. Unless we revert the decision and decide we do want > this terrible API... I would also not be in favour is resurrecting these interfaces. IME, it's incredibly fiddly to implement.. -- Stewart Brodie Software Engineer ANT Software Limited
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 11:16:49 UTC