- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:52:08 +0200
- To: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: "bert@w3.org" <bert@w3.org>, "Sam Fortiner" <samfort@microsoft.com>, "Travis Leithead" <travil@microsoft.com>
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:17:47 +0200, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: >> From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com] > >> Do you have any suggestions? Can Microsoft maybe provide us with an >> author/editor for CSSOM? :-) > > Are you asking me to volunteer ? To be clear, I'm not worried about > removing these. I know that even I can do that...But I'd like to > understand the impact of obsoleting this on existing SVG and CSS3 specs > as well as implementations, why we wanted to obsolete them etc. And I > think we're talking about DOM L2 Style here, not CSSOM. Right ? Well, CSSOM is the successor of DOM Level 2 Style (it replaces it). I was asking for someone to edit the replacement, which admittedly is a lot of work. I think the impact on CSS3 proposals is that they need to change. Same probably goes for SVG. Unless we revert the decision and decide we do want this terrible API... -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 17:52:46 UTC