- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:41:19 -0800
- To: news@terrainformatica.com
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Salar <salarsoftwares@gmail.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D4F97FC5-E7D8-477D-93D7-B4BF7DB0DCF2@gmail.com>
Using hacky layout methods are sometimes the best choice available to Web designers when trying to target the most widely used Web browsers, and also trying to achieve a particular layout. You may disagree with the subjective design choices, but Salar's e-mail was about proposed values, not about existing limitations in desktop software. As long as we are talking about proposals, I think it is clear that www-style list IS the place to talk about replacements for hacky layout tools. That is why we discuss template layout, grid positioning, flexible box layout, display:table-cell, etc., which COULD be alternatives to them (once they are widely implemented). On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Salar <salarsoftwares@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ... especially when float is *actually* used >> typographically, not just as a hacky page layout tool. > > Golden principle of constructive discussion: "Criticizing - propose". > > What are alternatives to "float as a hacky page layout tool" > in modern CSS and in foreseeable future? > > Just for the note, this is style sheet of W3 front page: > http://www.w3.org/2008/site/css/advanced > Rhetoric question: is massive float use there > a hacky page layout tool or not? > > I mean that www-style list is not the place where phrases > "float as a hacky layout tool" or "table as a hacky layout tool" make real sense. CSS has no alternatives to them, sorry. > > > > > -- > Andrew Fedoniouk. > > http://terrainformatica.com >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 17:42:00 UTC