W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

Re: New values for Float property

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:41:19 -0800
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Salar <salarsoftwares@gmail.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D4F97FC5-E7D8-477D-93D7-B4BF7DB0DCF2@gmail.com>
To: news@terrainformatica.com
Using hacky layout methods are sometimes the best choice available to Web designers when trying to target the most widely used Web browsers, and also trying to achieve a particular layout. You may disagree with the subjective design choices, but Salar's e-mail was about proposed values, not about existing limitations in desktop software. As long as we are talking about proposals, I think it is clear that www-style list IS the place to talk about replacements for hacky layout tools. That is why we discuss template layout, grid positioning, flexible box layout, display:table-cell, etc., which COULD be alternatives to them (once they are widely implemented).

On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:

> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Salar <salarsoftwares@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ... especially when float is *actually* used
>> typographically, not just as a hacky page layout tool.
> Golden principle of constructive discussion: "Criticizing - propose".
> What are alternatives to "float as a hacky page layout tool"
> in modern CSS and in foreseeable future?
> Just for the note, this is style sheet of W3 front page:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/site/css/advanced
> Rhetoric question: is massive float use there
> a hacky page layout tool or not?
> I mean that www-style list is not the place where phrases
> "float as a hacky layout tool" or "table as a hacky layout tool" make real sense. CSS has no alternatives to them, sorry.
> -- 
> Andrew Fedoniouk.
> http://terrainformatica.com

Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 17:42:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:40 UTC