- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:56:21 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Nov 6, 2009, at 10:50 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure I understand how the angle would flex, and currently > believe I would find it *very* confusing if I said "45deg" and ended > up with a gradient that wasn't a straight diagonal. The idea is that the spec would make it clear that you are specifying the angle as though on a square, but that the final image is dimensionless and could (would) be stretched and distorted. Just as though you created a square image in Photoshop with a 45deg gradient, and then resized the image (except you would have resolution independance).
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 20:57:07 UTC