- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:35:00 -0800
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 17:35:44 UTC
On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Simon Fraser wrote: > * When the angle form is used, it's unclear if the angle of the > rendered gradient is invariant under box aspect ratio changes <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0071.html > >. As far as this one goes, I know that what I was proposing there is different than what Tab had in mind. However, I believe that by combining the ideas of: requiring a keyword to make the angle invariant (otherwise it is not) and the idea of just using angles to indicate direction and color-stops for ALL indications of where colors begin or end), ...that we would have a much, much simpler, easier to read and understand syntax, with less default magic, while sacrificing almost nothing but a few edge cases. And that those edge cases could be handled with SVG. I would still have the distance measures (50px, for example) as invariant (thus a little magic there), as an alternative to percentages that would always vary with image size.
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 17:35:44 UTC