- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:55:12 -0800
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > > On 06/11/2009, at 9:35 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Wouldn't it make more sense for the default start point to be "top >>> center" >>> so that the default is a vertical gradient, like with Tab's proposal? >>> There >>> seem to be far more vertical gradients than diagonal gradients on the >>> Web. >> >> That was precisely what I was told when I last asked - vertical >> gradients seem to be the most common. > > Yeah, good point. > > linear-gradient(yellow, blue) - horizontal from top to bottom > > To me, the next most important thing is that the examples below make sense: > > linear-gradient(left, right, yellow, blue) - should be horizontal > linear-gradient(top, bottom, yellow, blue) - should be vertical > > I'd suggest these are going to be by far the most common, so they should be > simple to understand and make sense when read (aloud). If I return to allowing a two-point syntax (which I suspect I will, because of the additional uses that Simon brought up), it'll simply be: linear-gradient(left to right, yellow, blue) linear-gradient(top to bottom, yellow, blue) ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 22:56:06 UTC