- From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:54:22 +0100
- To: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
2009/6/26 Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>: > On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 13:47 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> wrote: >> >> > I have not been able to find any *quantification* >> > of the supposed practical benefits of MTX when >> > compared to other available, generic compression >> > methods (e.g., bzip2 or gzip with blocking to allow >> > some semblance of random access). >> >> Vladimir Levantovsky posted exactly the numbers you are asking for a >> couple days ago. I recall 10-30% additional compression relative to >> gzip. > > Searching the archives for obvious terms I can > not find the message you refer to. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0427.html Also search http://www.w3.org/Fonts/Misc/minutes-2008-10 for "gzip"
Received on Saturday, 27 June 2009 11:55:22 UTC